RHCP - Desecration Smile; Dir.: Gus Van Sant

www.youtube.com
Beautiful Colors. Shame it's so minimal, but hey it's Gus right? Whatever that means...
Still waitin' for Chris Rock's 'Hump De Bump' vid.
dingleberry, February 8, 2007 12:46:55 PM CET
a bit thin knowing that the budget was $100K...where the f*** did the money go? did they have french laundry or the ritz do catering?
egos, February 8, 2007 3:38:19 PM CET
maybe its me but I dont undestand this video, no beginning, no middle, no end, just everybody sharing hugs, I dont see the idea behind or maybe thats the idea, no idea at all...lusk81, February 8, 2007 3:41:43 PM CET
There's a brilliant comment on youtube that puts this one right into context:4CiT (says): "Love the fact that you could just make you own version of this with your own friends."
admirer from afar, February 8, 2007 4:34:41 PM CET
I happen to think this is fucking brilliant. Who cares where the money went if the results are this good? What an odd way of assessing a video. And life in general come to think of it. "Well, it's pretty good this video but because it cost a lot of money for what it is, it's shit."
"Well, this food is really nice but because it cost a lot of money it is shit."
"Mate, love that t-shirt, but how much was it? That's way too much, so when I was saying I liked it what I actually meant to say was it's horrible."
Etc. Clever.
dingleberry, February 8, 2007 5:14:15 PM CET
admirer: good point.let me reassess without taking the budget into account: its a shit video. you can call it ballsy, cute, or even fun...
but fucking brilliant? really? i guess there's a market for everything then.
30f, February 8, 2007 6:27:01 PM CET
I found it boring and I like the band alot and have usually enjoyed the "low-fi" direction their videos have taken recently. Seems like a clip made only to satisfy a contract the band has or to simply create more, EPK level content the band/label can market directly to hard-core fans down the road. Without the fame/charisma of the faces involved I wouldn't have made it even as far as the thirty seconds I did watch.casualaesthete, February 8, 2007 8:12:55 PM CET
Will Ferrell doesn't get as much screen time as the other chaps. Maybe it's the hat.Was enjoying the long take for the first 45 seconds or a minute, then was ready for some permutation. The setting is nice enough
spit, February 8, 2007 8:21:59 PM CET
Really amazing. A series of very good choices.ai, February 8, 2007 10:15:30 PM CET
Some people are happy to watch some other people happy to being watched happy.kayser_sauze, February 11, 2007 7:43:22 PM CET
WMV = WMV (15 MB)progosk, February 11, 2007 9:04:44 PM CET
memorable, but then i've been sold on pared-down intimacy for way too long already. (having a hard time believing anyone paid $100K for it, tho...)kevathens, February 15, 2007 1:18:12 AM CET
rhcp movkayser_sauze, August 7, 2007 11:25:23 PM CEST
alt version mov