Paul McCartney "Dance Tonight" dir. Michel Gondry

Only on YouTube at the moment
mov - youtube - more info
buenosonic, May 23, 2007 2:57:56 PM CEST
reminds me of his White Stripes video with projections on the walls. But the video is good. It's funny because the final scene looks like michel just wanting to have some fun doing a party.otc, May 23, 2007 4:29:59 PM CEST
Good stuff, although I couldn't even tell that Natalie Portman was in it until I read the website. The dangers of debuting your video on youtube.jesus christ, May 23, 2007 5:42:34 PM CEST
It's average which is a bit of disappointment as Gondry is a lot more 4D than this and it apparently cost a shed load of money so trying to really see where it all went? Obviously money doesn't = creativity but it damn well helps.prairie_oysters, May 23, 2007 6:09:29 PM CEST
I wonder if he's channeling 
www.youtube.com
Similarly hokey.
jesus christ, May 23, 2007 6:11:59 PM CEST
That's actually a better video... and song.30f, May 23, 2007 6:36:22 PM CEST
Where is the ghost of his ex-wife's leg?fellfromthesky, May 23, 2007 6:59:45 PM CEST
That guy from The Office... 10 thousand dollarsNatalie Portman... 20 thousand dollars
A music video paid for by a global coffee conglomerate... 1.6 million dollars (real number)
How much you were able to shove down your pants and make out the back door with... 1.1 million dollars
The chance to jam with Paul McCartney... Priceless.
There are some things in life money can't buy. For the rest of us, there's Death Cab for Cutie videos.
vidiot, May 23, 2007 7:39:22 PM CEST
Dazed & Confused Mag 'behind the scenes' piece here:www.dazeddigital.com
spit, May 23, 2007 8:00:28 PM CEST
1.6 million dollars? Seriously?monkeyman1138, May 23, 2007 8:06:24 PM CEST
Great video, good fun, lots of classic Gondry visuals. I feel the need to tell people that the Post Office vehicle Mackenzie Crook is driving at the beginning doesn't actually exist in real life, so I imagine a good chunk of the budget went on it.captainmarc22, May 23, 2007 8:11:12 PM CEST
Gondry probably hasn't done a commercial with a budget less than 1.6 million in 6 years; so the shoot was probably treated exactly like that. I liked it - it's charming. I thought it came together at the end when the household items switched places; I would've liked to see more of that theme.
Also- where was the McCartney impersonator?
prairie_oysters, May 23, 2007 8:38:37 PM CEST
"Also- where was the McCartney impersonator?"Starring in the video!
digilander.libero.it
This website may, or may not, be the work of a deranged twat though
ai, May 23, 2007 8:43:15 PM CEST
The funny thing is that i was more interested by the music they played at the right end. A good vid but some stuffs already used before.octopuss, May 23, 2007 9:57:09 PM CEST
PAUL IS NOT DEADwww.turnmeondeadman.net
The Frog Song is supreme evidence of this.
kevathens, May 23, 2007 10:52:10 PM CEST
That cost more than November Rain or Waterfalls? No dis to fellfromthesky, but I'll believe it when I hear it from a less-anonymous source. At least in his features, Michel is pretty conscientious of cost, and this doesn't look $1.6m tall.progosk, May 23, 2007 11:29:35 PM CEST
prarie: very uncanny, that (down to the lyrics)...prairie_oysters, May 24, 2007 12:44:10 AM CEST
You think that's uncanny? Check out this;

toddyokoh, May 24, 2007 1:53:54 AM CEST
fun video. oddly, not a bad song at all.siouxfire, May 24, 2007 3:19:03 AM CEST
That is a very disappointing Michel Gondry video. It's as bland as the song.simple16, May 24, 2007 4:57:28 AM CEST
it's a pretty good video. it's not ground breaking, but not everything has to be. an easy watch.jesus christ, May 24, 2007 12:04:43 PM CEST
I heard video was 1.6million dollars too. And I am the son of the lord God. Honest.or 3/4 of a million quid if you prefer. What a fantastically crap use of money for the postman pat van, maybe Michel gets to drive it around set on his features?
kupka, May 24, 2007 7:35:24 PM CEST
That was freaking funny!fellfromthesky, May 24, 2007 10:56:48 PM CEST
Yeah, i heard 750k pounds, but i did the conversion.pasi, May 25, 2007 11:19:29 AM CEST
Yeah, i heard it was 15 Mil. WHATEVER, who cares...jesse.ewles, May 25, 2007 9:49:17 PM CEST
Anybody consider that it may have been 1.6m and put together in two weeks?I'm just speculating; reminds me of Romanek story of how "scream" got to be so expensive.
fellfromthesky, May 26, 2007 10:48:16 AM CEST
people that make 50k videos for a living carewinchandpulley, May 29, 2007 9:18:07 PM CEST
So do people who make $500 videos.That said, economics aside, I think it's a pretty sweet. Where can I order a box with the ghost of Natalie Portman? That's what we all should really be asking.
kayser_sauze, July 11, 2007 10:01:09 AM CEST
Gondry movkevathens, July 11, 2007 12:40:00 PM CEST
thx kzr :)kayser_sauze, February 3, 2008 8:07:34 PM CET
20 min. making of = "On the Set of 'Dance Tonight'" directed by Marco Sandeman = mov