sign up and post links to cool music videos

OK Go - "Here It Goes Again"

"That dancing band" is up to it again, but this time on treadmills. These kinds of videos seem built to blow-up on YouTube.

MP4     MOV     WMP

spit, August 2, 2006 at 6:40:13 PM CEST

Better than every single video nominated for a moon man this year. Seriously.

benroll, August 2, 2006 at 6:44:22 PM CEST

Absolute class! Obviously a kind of sequel to their Million Ways vid, and a worthy sequel.

Love the overexposed left hand side and the crappy caption at the start.

Who directed? And who choreographed?

toddyokoh, August 2, 2006 at 6:49:09 PM CEST

Its like someone had this great idea for a highly produced choreographed video that had conveyor belts doing all the work and then someone else came up, looked at the treatment and said "nah, lets do this shit in my cousin's gym on the treadmills with tin foil in the background."

Great choice.

coady, August 2, 2006 at 6:53:26 PM CEST

This is a masterpiece.

weezerwill, August 2, 2006 at 8:29:36 PM CEST

im happy and i wanna jog for some reason...

captainmarc22, August 2, 2006 at 8:41:18 PM CEST

blah... they already did this shit. Spike Jonze doesn't follow up "Praise You" with more of the same, he tops it with "Weapon of Choice"... I know we're not talking about Jonze here but c'mon it's the exact same video. Think outside the box. Take that personality and dancing if you have to and do something interesting. Laaaaame.

progosk, August 2, 2006 at 9:01:52 PM CEST

probly same choreographer as million ways - good again, tho inevitably with less scope. tod's right about the style choice - but overall... i'm with the cap'n on this. had me bored after a minute.

spit, August 2, 2006 at 9:03:09 PM CEST

Whatever. As long as its fun to watch, who cares if it follows up a similarly themed video? It seems a little petty to slam something so good for a reason that only jaded record store clerks and dopey industry types will care about.

captainmarc22, August 2, 2006 at 9:19:30 PM CEST

the first one was cool because nobody expected a bunch of hipsters to dance so well; and the shot-on-video, locked-off camera added a lo-fi charm.

"It seems a little petty to slam something so good for a reason that only jaded record store clerks and dopey industry types will care about."

You're assuming I loved it but I'm concealing my true feelings for indie cred or something. I didn't like it because it felt stale, it had none of the surprises that made the first one fun and felt kind of sad; a band who's desperate to cling onto their 'one-hit-wonder' video.

If any other band did this, we'd all say it was a ripoff of OK GO. So how is it okay for OK GO to ripoff their previous work? Laaaaaaaame.

petulia, August 2, 2006 at 9:48:48 PM CEST

Totally great. Lots of inventive moves. I saw this one first, so I liked it. Frankly, when I went back, the first one bored me. They were just testing something out. This one has way more energy. You're all entitled to an opinion, but the choreographer on this totally rocks. And if it was them, then great.

Too bad all their music blows.

spit, August 2, 2006 at 10:06:17 PM CEST

Captain, The first video wasn't meant to be taken very seriously, and this one (i assume) is in the same vein. It's not like they found a really easy artistic idea to mass-produce either. It'd be one thing if took a day or two to put these spots together, but it looks like a lot of work went in to it- probably just as much work as most videos with 10 times the budget.

On an even more important level, these videos accomplish several things that most large-budget videos forget about; they're memorable, full of personality, and incredibly watchable. It's giving kids what they want-- unabashed fun, which seems to be an element that most video directors put on the backburner while they're constructing they're latest 'never been done before' tech fest that most kids won't even care about.

I'm willing to bet that the band was aware that some people would call them out on putting together a similar video, but I'm glad that they went with their instincts and released it anyway. Better to entertain people who actually enjoy pop music videos and a little bit of cheeky humor than to keep your credibility with a smaller, hipper audience that probably doesn't like OKGO anyway.

benroll, August 2, 2006 at 11:15:12 PM CEST

Sure it's more contrived, but it does up the ante. As a standalone piece it's very good. If you watch it and sense the insidious hand of marketing at work, you'll enjoy it less.

But you're quite right Cap'n M: It would have been better to see something every bit the equal of the first in a different vein. Perhaps what we're watching here is the trouble with repeating an unexpected runaway success.

kevathens, August 2, 2006 at 11:22:38 PM CEST

As a stand-alone video, it is great, but this reaction here stands as a warning to them. If they want to do this again, and I hope they do, they're going to have to severely up the ante. If they hold true, they have a chance to really shine here with this concept. Video sequels are a tricky lot. (er, Sorry, Madonna)

spit, August 3, 2006 at 2:25:21 AM CEST

Yes OKGO, Heed this serious warning; Releasing clever music videos may get you more online viewership than an entire day of Fuse, but it can also cost you the artistic credibilty that you so desperately seek from the world of uber-specific music video forums. Please ignore the thousands of normal people who will enjoy your video at face value and set unnecessary limitations on yourselves in the name of unwritten artistic guidelines!

musicvideosyay, August 3, 2006 at 2:50:45 AM CEST

"blah... they already did this shit. Spike Jonze doesn't follow up "Praise You" with more of the same, he tops it with "Weapon of Choice"... I know we're not talking about Jonze here but c'mon it's the exact same video. Think outside the box. Take that personality and dancing if you have to and do something interesting. Laaaaame."


mricc, August 3, 2006 at 3:16:15 AM CEST

loved it!

didn't spike jonze follow "rokkafella skank" with "praise you"?

aliaspail, August 3, 2006 at 7:38:15 PM CEST

jeeez. how hard they must've studied. they are tighter in movement then a varsity pom squad.

winchandpulley, August 4, 2006 at 3:32:52 AM CEST

You guys are whiny bitches. This is more of a great thing.

coady, August 4, 2006 at 11:40:47 PM CEST

agreed, winchandpulley -- it's one thing to be a gourmet and keep tabs on mv history and share your expert critique, but when you see something as fun as this, it's a real shame to drown in your own sea of knowledge...

laadeeda, August 9, 2006 at 3:02:27 AM CEST

ok. IT'S ONLY A MUSIC VIDEO. It's a funny nice MUSIC VIDEO. It's not the cure for cancer. You guys take this stuff so seriously. This is not Michelangelo or the cure for cancer. Have a nice day and lighten up because it's only MUSIC VIDEOS.

corpse tomb, August 9, 2006 at 5:08:47 AM CEST

What music video?

kevathens, August 9, 2006 at 2:39:28 PM CEST

The proof is in the pudding: OK Go have 1,943,770 hits, and were featured on Good Morning America (with the YouTube guys) this morning. ("Touch the Sky" by Kanye West got about 4 million on Tube, if you recall)

corpse tomb, August 10, 2006 at 1:41:21 AM CEST

no,I don't listen to that kind of music I listen to Metal,Screamo,Emo,and things like that.sorry-_-if I wasted your time.

kevathens, August 11, 2006 at 6:24:59 PM CEST

OKGo-meter: 2,428,666 hits at YouTube - mov

kevathens, August 11, 2006 at 6:31:48 PM CEST

Karen O, eat your heart out

spit, August 12, 2006 at 4:48:37 AM CEST

6 non-industry people asked me this week if I had seen this video. No one asked if I'd seen the new the new Horrors video. Welcome to music videos in 2006.

captainmarc22, August 12, 2006 at 4:58:01 AM CEST

2.3 million hits on youtube in a week. TRL gets less than 750,000 viewers a day.

even though i bitched it was unoriginal, you gotta give them credit for being so successful. And apparently a lot of people hadn't even seen the original "A Million Ways."

yeah, welcome to 2006 indeed!

kevathens, August 18, 2006 at 1:32:32 AM CEST

OKGO-meter: 3,315,157 hits - plus about 250,000 at other copies

kevathens, September 3, 2006 at 6:26:57 PM CEST

OKGO-meter: 5.1m hits +

windfucker, September 4, 2006 at 10:52:35 AM CEST

This guy's going to have to tack an OK Go segment onto the end of his clip. (32m hits)

langdonallger, September 5, 2006 at 3:37:45 AM CEST

i hate that guy

kevathens, September 23, 2006 at 10:15:42 PM CEST

OKGO-meter: 6.6m hits - less than 2 months

aceofbase, September 23, 2006 at 10:49:59 PM CEST

The preview I've seen on iTunes seems like much better quality than the ones linked to here although it is still a great video even with the lower quality.

Here's a 30 second iTunes preview:

Does anyone know where I can get a high quality vid like that without signing up for iTunes and purchasing it?

kevathens, December 12, 2006 at 4:51:34 AM CET

OKGO-meter: 8.9m hits - Might as well include the official YouTube link

daku, December 18, 2006 at 6:50:47 PM CET


kevathens, February 12, 2007 at 3:35:08 AM CET

OKGO-meter: 11.1m hits. Just won the Grammy for best mv, which makes sense.

spit, February 12, 2007 at 4:09:18 AM CET

I think we need to stop making 'viral' sound like a consolation prize in the world of music videos. In the age of youtube, shouldn't EVERY video be aiming for viral status? I honestly don't know why any label would want any rock artist to do standard cosmetic videos anymore.

30f, February 12, 2007 at 5:04:42 PM CET

spit - the reason labels like traditional videos is that they have a history of selling records (less so lately, of course). Labels want to sell records, not get the most hits on YouTube.

Is there a smarter way for labels to turn the interest demonstrated by viral videos INTO money? - of course there is. Viral attention is like "word of mouth" or "critical acclaim" - they only matter to the bottom line IF those things turn into cash money. And labels only care about the straight cash.

spit, February 12, 2007 at 6:20:40 PM CET

30f, it's not surprising that the music industry hasn't found a way to capitalize on the full potential of viral videos. They're still trying to operate via the pre-internet model, which is why sales are down across the board. Traditional videos might sell more records if you're an R&B star with a giant marketing campaign and guaranteed MTV exposure, but the other 95 percent of bands and acts that are going to field treatments for their single are selling themselves short with the standard band footage/b roll concept. OKGO might not be able to translate every youtube viewing into a sale, but they went from a band that was lost in the shuffle to having a hit single and selling a couple hundred thousand records. Not every band might have the smarts (and coordination) to pull of a treadmill video, but you'd think that with the internet, youtube, and the ascendancy of 'viral' as the buzzword of choice in most marketing meetings we would see a shift in the types of videos being made that mirrored the actual changes in the industry.

familiar, February 12, 2007 at 6:45:56 PM CET

"selling a couple hundred thousand records"

Really? I had no idea. That kind of success for a band like OK Go is almost unheard of.

30f, February 12, 2007 at 11:29:00 PM CET

Here is a longer version of my thoughts.

kevathens, March 27, 2007 at 1:52:21 PM CEST

OKGO-meter: 13.3 million hits, plus a YouTube Award

kevathens, April 7, 2007 at 2:27:15 AM CEST

OKGO-meter: ~15 million hits

kevathens, July 9, 2007 at 1:50:03 AM CEST

OKGO-meter: 3 months and it's jumped to ~26 million hits


kevathens, September 29, 2007 at 10:10:02 PM CEST

OKGO-meter: ~30.7m hits (a few million more since some videos got deleted) in 13 months

Girlfriend-meter: ~55.4 million hits in 7 months

MCR "Famous Last Words": ~37m

kevathens, May 6, 2008 at 2:32:59 AM CEST

OKGO-meter: 34m hits Girlfriend: 82m MCR: 52m

dek, February 22, 2010 at 8:59:17 PM CET


(via Sean Pecknold)


Hiya stranger, login to post links to music videos.

You can subscribe to this site as RSS or on twitter.

Made with Antville

Recent comments:
Like ARTMS, BADVILLAIN debuts... robodrug; 03:32
Cheers Kev :) robodrug; 03:01
MV PRODUCTION : ZANYBROS EP... kevathens; 02:39
Glay is a Japanese... robodrug; 02:26
The five girls of... robodrug; 01:37
More #historic view count... kevathens; 19:21
Kind of a historic... kevathens; 23:50
MTV Live played the... kevathens; 00:29
Backstory: After being fired... kevathens; 23:11
JT is 1/2 of... kevathens; 22:43
This is Beastie Boys... kevathens; 00:42
Not being into girls... kevathens; 00:38
+1 kevathens; 00:35
More CGI robodrug; 02:43
That's some video! robodrug; 01:44
Former member of (G)I-dle,... robodrug; 01:37
Great clip kevathens; 22:47
‘How Sweet’ Performance Video:... robodrug; 21:32
I never say this... kevathens; 02:33
Got panned on antville... kevathens; 01:49
347M - Back to... kevathens; 01:45
It’s official: I’m too... kevathens; 19:04
Made a splash in... kevathens; 01:19
This isn’t the version... kevathens; 01:48
ano is a former... robodrug; 23:58
Translation: ano ft. Rira... robodrug; 23:54
Think I prefer aespa... robodrug; 23:16
Very R&B! robodrug; 23:08
That's cool! People are... robodrug; 01:05
Washed Out Responds to... kevathens; 23:29
himmm I really only... robodrug; 19:38
Hong Kong robodrug; 18:12
Apparently all 24 members!... robodrug; 17:33
💚 tobi; 09:38 : HyunA confesses... kevathens; 02:38
Filmed at the Louvre kevathens; 02:28
Youth Lagoon Slams Washed... kevathens; 20:24
Absolutely top class kevathens; 01:07
This may also be... kevathens; 00:31
—BREAKTHROUGH VIDEO-- kevathens; 20:40
…and reposted kevathens; 20:51
She’s like Sade: sweet,... kevathens; 02:22
From PetaPixel, on TikTok:... kevathens; 21:32
Tis the season (for... kevathens; 20:50
The return of the... kevathens; 20:45
It’s nice that’s about... kevathens; 01:21
Big Trouble in K-Pop... robodrug; 03:25
Tokyo! Sorry should have... robodrug; 02:18
Didn’t really like this... kevathens; 01:54
Where is that kevathens; 22:34

June 2024